|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CTF-MellWoot | | Map Info |
| | File Name | ctf-mellw0ot.zip | Author | JonnyMellis | Gametype | UT Capture the Flag | Date Added | 07-05-2005 | File Version | 2.00 | File Size | 1.01 mb | Player Count | 10 | Map Description | NOT a ripoff, more like a tribute to "W00tabulus". If you like the "w00t"-maps I think you might like this one... | Review Rating | -- | User Rating | 4.5 | Overall Rating | -- |
|
| | | Review |
| No review currently available for this map. Click here to request a review of this map.
| | Map Comments |
| Deceased 07-07-2005 09:41 PM MDT | Rating: 2 | | "Another W00tabulus-clone? Well I think this one´s pretty cool." - Mell ( copied from the readme )
Im sure Mell is the only person who'll be thinking that ;)
basicaly, each base is constructed of 2 giant starcases hollowed out, and a few floaty platforms much like the original w00t. And again much like the original w00t, this one sucks teh mancock too ^_^
Edit: @ RedFist: This (http://nalicity.beyondunreal.com/map_hub.php?mid=1523) is w00t. Dunno if you already seen it, but i thought id give link to original. if you already know, then others who dont can :D
Edit2: @ fluffymike: i dont believe it is fair to rate a map based on what it is inspired by no mattter how loved or hated that inspiration is. Every user or reviewer here should have a list of things in their heads they look for in maps that makes them unique and a cut above the rest (or atleast they should do). Whether this list is headed by originality, gameplay, architecture and structure, or whatever may be a favourite part of maps for people, each map SHOULD be treat as a map with nothing else to compare it to, apart from previous version, And be rated according to the 'list' or preferences in map making the user/reviewer has. And i dont see it fair to rate a map high because of favouritism for another map or gametype etc. But what i do believe is that every map and mapper should be treat with respect and rated/reviewed without influence from any other released map other than the preferences of the user. ( As in a liking for certain architectural structures, texturing, gameplay, Z-Axis fighting or whatever ).
Anyway, I've had my say on the subject and I'll leave it as that. I havent posted this in hope tat it will start yet another flaming match between authors and people rating. Oh, and it's not the best idea to start throwing insults around such as "lame-asses"... or any others in fact. You wont make a good name for yourself ;)
If you wish to comment back don't reply here,((ask me for my email or something or find it out yourself) (its either in my profile thingy, or a readme on one of my maps), as im sure people dont want to read your argument at what a map should be rated on, or a rant about lameness and whatever else you may want to write. ...Im pretty sure they dont wanna read what i've got to say on this matter anymore as i've probs already made this comments section too long to want to read ^_^
Edit3: @ Mell: Lol, Yeah i guess your right Mell, but someones gotta try create order amoungst the real hardcore players/mapper who are serious about the whole thing ( and im proud to say im not one of them). and this is my final FINAL say on this comment section.... im spamming it up :$ lol
| redfist 07-05-2005 11:45 AM MDT | | Could someone at least explain what the hell "WooT is anyway,I seen it around but whats the deal.
| CyMek 07-05-2005 12:04 PM MDT | Rating: 2.5 | | If you're making a new map that has a somewhat different and new idea of gameplay style, adn it turns out to suck, fine, I wont blame you. I'll congradulate you for trying something new. But when something has been proven to suck (many times) then yeah, I blame you.
2.5 since it does work, and since it does work, and has the potential to be a good map, even though it is not realized
| GOD__AM 07-05-2005 04:49 PM MDT | | From Wekipedia:
The term "w00t" is a slang interjection used to express happiness or excitement, usually over the Internet. The expression is most popular on USENET posts [1], multiplayer computer games (especially first-person shooters), IRC chats, and instant messages, though use on the World Wide Web in the form of weblogs or in forums is by no means uncommon.
Anyone see the irony here?
| Mellburn 07-07-2005 07:24 PM MDT | | Thanks 4 comments, I may be wrong but we tested this map during a LAN party 7-8 players and we HAD fun... (at least I had) or maybe everyone was high or drunk...
EDIT: OK, Maybe this map never should have been made or uploaded to NC... I´ll give it a couple of days just to see if anyone downloads or comments on it... If not, I´ll delete it...
EDIT2: Good point, Fluffy I hear you... and thx!
Deceased - I usally enjoy to read your comments - on whatever map or author...Good or bad. But now you are being a bit too serious... Hey ! -It´s only a game... Right? :)
| niX 07-07-2005 01:45 PM MDT | Rating: 1.5 | | woot wanna-be. woot's are over rated, please we dont need anymore.
| fluffymike 07-08-2005 01:16 PM MDT | Rating: 7 | | It says quite clearly that it's a woot-style map. If you don't like woot then it aint likely you're going to like this map - so wtf bother to download it only to slag it? Some people just can't help eing ignorant can they. Mel - put it back for those who like the map to enjoy and sod these lame-asses who seek only to put down people who don't follow their puerile lead.
edit 1 - just to clarify - deceased wasn't one of the people my earlier comment was aimed at. Regardless of if he reads this or not ;-)
| Mister_Prophet 07-08-2005 04:36 AM MDT | | woot wanna-be. woot's are over rated, please we dont need anymore.
I could say the same thing about BT maps;)
| Vatcilli zeitchef 07-15-2005 08:51 AM MDT | Rating: 3.5 | | Ok about the map
The good: The screenshot is nice The textures too
The bad: No botpathing they just stand around. The bases are of awfull design. No Music, It automaticly takes the menumusic.
And that's all I have to say.
| sammy 05-20-2006 06:02 AM MDT | Rating: 7 | | good fun map,i love woot maps its just a pity some people can give it bad ratings. if you like woot maps then you will enjoy this one
| Coreper 05-21-2006 03:26 AM MDT | Rating: 0 | | w00t maps are supposed to be great and fast... this map IS fast, but not great...: if you want to make a decent w00t map try to follow these guidelines: [you already have some] + Map must feature w00t style kickers[not all red :S] ,a big non-walkable gap and a fall that results in instant death somewhere between the flags. - Map must have a simple to follow, symmetrical layout and as a guideline be reasonably low poly ( a rough ballpark figure being 250-450. + Map must have clearly identifiable team colouring in bases and throughout map. [+ is what you need, - is what you have]
| security 05-20-2006 12:37 PM MDT | Rating: 6.5 | | This map looks very good. and the idea of stairs around the base is cool too. but some of those jumpers dont have sound and when using the jumpers at the bottom platform, if you move, it will over shoot you and youll die. which may not be good when there is and enemy there. The bases are nice where the flag is. and fighting on stairs can be fun too. so id say overall a good map
| knullansikte 05-21-2006 11:13 AM MDT | Rating: 9 | | This is a very playable woot-map, I like that you can play on the backside of the stairs...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|