|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CTF-Cursed_Face | | Map Info |
| | File Name | ctf-cursed_face.zip | Author | Cursed Soul | Gametype | UT Capture the Flag | Date Added | 06-23-2004 | File Version | 1.00 | File Size | 944 kb | Player Count | 8+ | Map Description | None | Review Rating | -- | User Rating | 5 | Overall Rating | -- |
|
| | | Review |
| No review currently available for this map. Click here to request a review of this map.
| | Map Comments |
| Manticore 06-24-2004 03:11 AM MDT | Rating: 3 | | Although I really like the visual style of the forts I can't rate (yet another) Face clone any higher than this.
| XepptizZ 06-24-2004 07:39 AM MDT | Rating: 6 | | Well I can, it almost has an eerie feeling. the archi style is nice but just not good enough. I 've also deducted some point's, because it's not the most original idea to make a face conversion. But I like Deck 40 so I shouldn't hate remakes. This isn't such a bad remake, but has a lot of room for improvement.
| CursedSoul1 06-24-2004 08:08 AM MDT | | lol i do agree, remakes are hard to rate, and in the end they are all about the same.
dont worry ill never make a remake again (unless i got a really good reason) remakes just help the map live longer... though most people stick tothe original ones, and i cant blaim em :)
| Scott Hrivnak 06-24-2004 12:33 PM MDT | Rating: 3 | | Nice visuals, but im tired of seeing so many Face remakes...the only good ones are Teddy's 2k3 one and FaceClassic from 2k4.
| volkov 06-24-2004 09:52 PM MDT | Rating: 6 | | Another Face clone, but good architecture
| [Dark-JaXx] 06-26-2004 07:03 AM MDT | Rating: 5 | | Hell yeah, some mappers has difficult with the greatness of epic-maps, and can't lay off, for adding something news on it...Hard, but true. But some guys got my compliments of that, cause they use almost exactly the same based level, but with another lay-out, with much succes(Deck 40) I think, you could do more with the theme 'face'(Be creative! That will be always respected) Honestly, you have done pretty things with the towers, I just admit that. But such as things with the sky-box, or the background, things like that..., it's just a part of working on it, and you receive ,whatever, something original! Mwah...Not worth a 3 or 4, so I give you respective, a 5
| NovaTheHedgehog 03-18-2005 10:13 AM MST | Rating: 3 | | Hmm, very nice LOOKING, but has no real changes over the original. Therefor, it has no substance, and I deem it someone else's work. This is rather limited, but I do like the style, so I give it a 3.
| Commander2 08-03-2005 12:25 AM MDT | Rating: 8 | | I don't care what anyone says, this map is badass. You pulled off a "face remake, but not quite..." feel to it. I can play this map a lot without feeling the boredom the normal Face gives.
There are a mess load of differences between Face and Cursed face, but a lot are too stupid and close minded to see it.
| kais 08-03-2005 04:42 AM MDT | Rating: 6.5 | | I'm not reall such a big fan of remakes, specially if a map has been remaked way to often. But this map isn't that bad, the looks are pretty cool, the midfield might even be better looking than the original. BUT its not nearly as much fun to play than the original and I really dont like the skybox.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|