DM-Challenge
Map Info
	File Name dm-challenge.zip Author Dermion Gametype UT2k4 Deathmatch Date Added 04-29-2004 File Version 1.00 File Size 2.02 mb Player Count 3-8 Map Description Medium sized map with many open spaces in an around an old temple. Review Rating -- User Rating 5 Overall Rating --
Review
No review currently available for this map. Click here to request a review of this map.
Map Comments
OLDMAN(CO30) 04-30-2004 01:57 PM MDT Rating: 10   I love it well done. Plenty of room, plenty of everything, this map has more places to run/jump, hide and snip. Good flow on my pc and very nice on the eyes. UPDATE Thats why I liked it a very smooth running map. The whole time I played it it had a good feel and sometimes thats better than all the adds. Waiting for your next map. 1/2LuNaTiC 04-29-2004 07:43 PM MDT Rating: 3   sooo boxy.. sandorski 04-30-2004 02:50 AM MDT Rating: 8   Very good map. Manticore 05-04-2004 12:56 AM MDT Rating: 1   This map reminds me of Tactical Ops for some reason. I'm not too impressed by the build and yes; tooooooo boxy... Additional comment to Mastedude: Quote: "Can't understand why people give this map a 3." I'm entitled to my opinion, so are you. In my opinion anyone can create a box, build some more boxes inside it (or other shapes) and subtract the volumes. They can then add some textures of dubious scaling, some meshes that don't quite fit and call it a map. Then someone will give it a low rating...... Additional comment to Dermion below: 1. Quote: "because none of you". When the plural states that there are only two persons (Manticore and Mangan) in the subject/object/predicate structure the proper grammatical construction is "neither of you". Also the conjunction isn't "So i won't" it's ",but I won't"..... 2. Because I'm entitled to MY OPINION I've changed my rating. 3. As for me not releasing a map? I wouldn't want to release anything that isn't at least TEN TIMES as good as this ill-conceived and poorly constructed excuse for a death match map. Dermion 05-05-2004 05:04 AM MDT   Nice to see, that some people like my map. Its my first release, so :) The boxy architecture is intentional. I could have used more static meshes, but so it runs more smoothly. Thanks for the comments anyway To Slaskan: As i mentioned its my first release. I started working on it with 2k3. (It actually contains antiportals) To Manticore & Mangan: You know one could take your comments as an insult. So i wont, because none of you released anything yet. Sorry if offended someone. Changing your "opinion" is OK for me. I´ll only tell you one thing: It takes quite a lot of time to "build some boxes and carve out other boxes, add textures of dubious scaling". You should consider this the next time you piss someone off. Hope you got the point. MasterDudE 04-30-2004 04:13 PM MDT Rating: 8   Like the diversion in tiny halls and open spaces. Good job! Can't understand why people give this map a 3. mangan }swe{ 05-03-2004 10:39 AM MDT Rating: 3   no no nooooo! this map isnt worthy this game it could be 12 times nicer without taking down the fps just add some antiportals and some deco! everything looked like ut99 nut the framerate looked like 2k4 slaskan 05-03-2004 11:04 AM MDT Rating: 3   y u have ut2k3 weapon and healing pads on 2k4 map?????? ======================================================= What do u mean ``i dont understand how people can give this a three´´? this map could have been smoother running with some antiportal volume and some more meshes. THIS MAP MAY BE GOOD (IN SOMEONES OPINION) BUT IT NOT WORTH TEN ABSOLUTLEY NOT WORTHY A TEN, A MAP THAT GETS A TEN MUST HAVE IT ALL NOT ONLY SMOOTHNESS IN FPS Shadowlurker 05-03-2004 04:11 PM MDT Rating: 3   This map is not, and I say this without offence, worth more than an 5. Bearing that in mind, it is not that bad. A little more love and effort qouldn't go amiss. It looks bland as it is - better lighting and better use of decoration would help the map visually. As for the gameplay, well, the layout just isn't good.