HaraldJohnsonSr
09-22-2003 01:51 PM MDT | Rating: 4 | |
DM-Deck16-AntalusStyle was fun for a bit,creative, and not 4 everyone.If only ALL MAPS were AntalusStylized hmm...JOKE.
|
[morpheus]
09-22-2003 02:13 PM MDT | Rating: 7 | |
The refresment of the Deck 16 "series" we've been waiting for from the beginning. Lovely.
|
_GMotha
12-24-2003 04:03 PM MST | Rating: 2 | |
a 2 because the author actually put a bit work in it
|
[Snuff]
09-23-2003 09:25 PM MDT | Rating: 6 | |
This is one of the more than five deck 16 remakes on my drive. What a tribute to the original author's creation to have so many remakes. I like the visuals on this map and the play is solid deck 16.
|
]BMR[VorLoN
12-24-2003 11:40 AM MST | Rating: 3 | |
Btw this map`s not good, and i don`t like (bad) remakes too :P
|
Madogg_UK
12-31-2003 05:23 AM MST | Rating: 7 | |
Just cuz its a remake, doesnt mean you rate it low. You rate it on the work, as if you've never seen the map before. If its a terrible MAP then sure, if its a brilliant map, you still give it a high rating. I think all those who give remakes low ratings are just pathetic. You dont rate them cuz they're remakes, you rate them on how good they are
EDIT: Gargorias - shut up
|
Gargorias
12-30-2003 05:37 AM MST | Rating: 3 | |
No we don't rate them on how good they are but rather on how better they are compared to the original and then we take several points of because they actually didn't design the layout in the first place. Anyone can pretty an old map up but it takes much more skill to design one from scratch.
|
{RiP}Captain_Sideburns
12-30-2003 10:35 PM MST | Rating: 5 | |
I'll give it a 5 for the an original idea applied to and older concept.
|
Bot40
12-31-2003 10:16 AM MST | Rating: 4 | |
@ Madogg: No, nalicity's review policy has always been to only give points for improvements made over the original. No points for layout can be given because there is basicly no changes to the overall layout, however some effort has gone into the visuals. It's not amazing looking, but the original was the most ugly map ever made so it can score okish here.
It's prolly closer to a 3/10 but I've gone soft :p
|
Shadowlurker
07-09-2004 04:53 PM MDT | Rating: 0 | |
[21:51:33] [+Shadowlurker]: ANTULUS STYLE DECK? OMFG NO!
[21:51:47] [+Shadowlurker]: THATS LIKE COMBINING AIDS AND SYTHERUS!
[21:51:48] [+Shadowlurker]: ARGH
[21:51:50] [+Shadowlurker]: HORRIBLE
[21:51:53] [+Bot_40]: lolololololololol
[21:52:07] [+Shadowlurker]: THAT
[21:52:08] [+Shadowlurker]: WILL
[21:52:11] [+Shadowlurker]: MAKE ME DIE
[21:52:15] [+Shadowlurker]: A HORRIBLE DEATH
[21:52:30] [+Bot_40]: I am going to make a deck17 remake
[21:52:39] [+Bot_40]: just change the music to a trance song
[21:52:48] [+The_Purple_Bunny]: All Deck remakes should be banned by international and intergalactic law.
[21:52:53] [+Bot_40]: DM-Deck17-FerryCorstenClubMix
[21:52:54] [+Shadowlurker]: I couldn't be a warrior, a slave i couldn't be. A fighter and a conquerer, fighting to be... argh? whats this? HOLY SHIT IT'S HALF DECK HALF ANTULUS! A TRULEY FEARSOME BEAST THIS BE!
[Admin: NC apologizes for the above IRC text... we don't let Shadowlurker out much. ;) ]
|
Theseus314
07-09-2004 06:13 PM MDT | Rating: 5 | |
I didn't hate this remake, and I do tend to hate most of them.
|
CursedSoul1
09-03-2004 01:40 PM MDT | Rating: 3 | |
whuahaha @ shadowlurker.
fun remake though, nothing special.
|
UT
UT2k3
U2
UT2k4 
