|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CTF-Phobos Impact Zone | | Map Info |
| | File Name | ctf-impactzone.zip | Author | SylverFyre | Gametype | UT2k3 Capture The Flag | Date Added | 03-04-2003 | File Version | 1.00 | File Size | 1.8 mb | Player Count | 8-12 | Map Description | None | Review Rating | -- | User Rating | 5 | Overall Rating | -- |
|
| | | Review |
| No review currently available for this map. Click here to request a review of this map.
| | Map Comments |
| Theshark 03-07-2003 05:15 AM MST | Rating: 9 | | WOW! - Great Map! You have done yourself well proud mate! Superb environment, looks very pretty and plays like a dream!
DOWNLOAD IT NOW!
| SylverFyre 03-07-2003 06:41 PM MST | | Glad u liked it - thx :)
| Morphias 03-07-2003 08:10 PM MST | Rating: 4 | | Why do ppl rate maps if they like it or not.
I can't see not much lighting here, and the lack of GP (Game Play) makes it way to easy to get 199 health 150 armor and the Ion Painter to boost. This makes the map no challenge, unless you like maps like that, I don't. The fact I spent almost the entire time in the blue base without dying either makes me just too good, or the map is lacking something.
A 9 by the other user to me is wrong, a 9 to me is a near perfect map, this is not a near perfect map.
I have a Gf4 Ti4200, AMD xp2200 and I experienced lag in the open middle part of the map. I will give a plus that the map is optimised correctly.
Work on the lighting and try to make smaller fighting areas for a CTF game. All in all, it was great to play, but I won't give it a nine because I liked the map.
| {DAM}MoxNix 03-08-2003 07:23 PM MST | Rating: 5 | | "Why do ppl rate maps if they like it or not." Doh! Really gotta wonder about someone who asks a question like that.
| Freak_ 04-25-2003 07:49 PM MDT | Rating: 1 | | QUESTION: Put all kinds of **** together quess what you'll get? ( Yep CTF-Phobos Impact ZOne )
| Czm21x 04-26-2003 05:25 AM MDT | Rating: 5 | | Not my cup of tea. But it's okay.
| XGEOX 04-27-2003 07:29 AM MDT | Rating: 6 | | I sometimes wonder when ppl place comments like 'this map sucks - is the author a retard?'...
Surely you've matured enough to be capable of making constructive, non-offensive comments which help the mapper improve his abilities rather than scare him off mapping althogether.
If a map doesnt fit your personal taste, that does not mean it deserves a slagging off - you're ratings should be based on the quality of construction, playability and originality. And if a map is week in any of those areas, offer advice on how to improve it, don't just abuse the author.
-to the author..
You've got a nice concept here which works well. However the map is in need of refinement - the flow is quite good, but the size of the map (in particular the central area) causes problems - it's too open, which firstly hampers playability, and secondly results in poor performance (i got considerable lag in the central crater area). Consider reducing the size of that area. Also try to tweak your weapon placement a bit.
| Bot40 04-27-2003 04:54 PM MDT | Rating: 4 | | "That would be the general idea of rating a map." errmm no. What if someone enjoys running around in a cube blindfold pressing random keys? Does that make a cube a good map? You are supposed to look at a map critically, not just say "Oh, I enjoyed myself for like, 10 mins, therefore this map rocks" Then all cube maps would get 10/10 O_o
"Doh! Really gotta wonder about someone who asks a question like that." Ya, maybe they are one of the few people who have some sense.
| Doctor Nick 04-28-2003 05:45 AM MDT | Rating: 5 | | Bot40 what in hell are you talking about, did I make any reference to the quality of the map in that particularly statement? I know its a cube with meshes, its not really that hard to notice.
Hence the 5 i gave it, and still do give it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|